School Improvement

Treviglas Community College Action Plan 2017-18

Please find below a summary of our Action Plan 2017-18. If any parent/carer would like to scrutinise the detailed Action Plan then they are welcome to arrange to meet with the Headteacher by contacting Mrs A Datlen, PA to Headteacher on 01637 872076 or by email to: A.Datlen@treviglas.cornwall.sch.uk

Treviglas Action Plan 2017-18

Summary of recent monitoring visit reports

School Effectiveness Cornwall – Monitoring visit 13th December 2017

The school have now received the report from the monitoring visit that took place on Wednesday 13th December 2017 by the Local Authority as part of standard operating procedures for a school judged to be inadequate and requiring special measures.

  • This was the second School Effectiveness Cornwall (SEC) visit since the school received its most recent section 5 Ofsted inspection
  • The visit equated to 3.0 officer days

The officers visited 16 lessons across key stages 3 and 4, met with students from year 10 and a group of parents. They identified that where learning is better:

  • Learning objectives and essential questions are clearly displayed and referred to during the lesson
  • Students know what they need to do to improve and respond to marking appropriately
  • Attitudes to learning are positive and students respond well to questioning
  • Questioning is targeted and does not depend upon hands up. Teachers ask probing supplementary questions such as, ‘Yes, but why?’
  • Work is displayed on the Wonder Walls and student books contain a good quantity of marked work with next steps feedback
  • Students are well supported by support staff in class

Where teaching is less effective:

  • The activities are not planned sufficiently taking into account the prior knowledge of students or their ability. Consequently some students are not actively engaged in their learning
  • The classroom environment is poor which is reflected in a lack of pride in the work produced
  • Teachers rely upon a ‘hands up; approach to questioning, which means that it cannot be targeted upon pupil premium or other student groups
  • Teachers do not check for understanding before moving on to the next stage of the lesson and this means that some students are left behind
  • Teachers do not make best use of their interactions during group, paired or individual work to further develop or reinforce learning
  • Teachers and students do not make use of prompts and exemplification in displays where they exist

The date of the next visit by the Local Authority is on Monday 29th January

Rob Haring (Education Adviser) – monitoring visit 30th November 2017

What are the school’s strengths?

The School is in the midst of a period of turbulence. Following an Ofsted inspection (June 2017) in which the school was judged inadequate the Governing Body has been dissolved, an IEB established, and an Acting Headteacher appointed.

  • The Acting Headteacher, who was previously Deputy Headteacher at the school, is working hard to stabilise the school and embark on a rapid improvement journey against a backdrop of budget deficit and long-term absence from within the SLT.
  • The Acting Headteacher is a long serving member of staff and is passionate about the school and its students. She knows the school well and is honest in her opinion of the school’s current position and the challenge that lies ahead. She recognises that all of the school’s key performance indicators fall significantly short of where they would expect to be.
  • The Acting Headteacher has introduced a new behaviour policy and there is evidence that this is having an impact. During the visit students were calm, respectful and in the lessons visited behaviour was fine. Having said these students were compliant as opposed to exhibiting a thirst for learning.
  • Despite the difficulties facing the school, students were positive and the Year 11 students spoken to were keen to do well and succeed in their GCSE examinations. Indeed, several spoke of hoping or striving to achieve high grades in English and Maths.
  • Importantly the SLT has managed to recruit new staff that joined the school at the start of the academic year. Most notably the maths department is now fully staffed with qualified maths teachers – a contrast to recent years.
  • English teaching was seen in Year 11 and seemed secure and consistent across the groups seen. The snippet of a top set Year 11 seen was engaging with a degree of ‘sparkle’ and was an illustration of what can be achieved.
  • There is clear evidence that marking is improving and that students are receiving feedback on how to improve.

 Areas for Development

  • The shape of the school day and structure of the curriculum are barriers to success that need to be overcome. For students to enjoy a rich, broad and engaging learning experience whilst at the same achieving a portfolio of examination success changes need to be made.
  • The quality of teaching and learning needs to be developed such that more lessons genuinely engage students’ interest, spark a passion for learning and secure progress.
  • Data tracking and monitoring systems need to be established that scaffold realistic ambition and effectively inform progress.
  • Student attendance needs to improve. Work has begun in this crucial area but attendance remains below the national average.
  • Strengthen middle leadership such that it can become a real driver for school improvement.

 School Effectiveness Cornwall – Monitoring visit 13th October 2017

Where learning was seen to be effective

  • Children in Care are on track or above and making steady progress within the lesson.
  • Students work well together for example exploring how different tones can be used to change meaning when acting out a scene from Romeo and Juliet.
  • The quality of presentation in exercise books reflects the pride that students feel towards their work.
  • Consistent use of ‘essential questions’ to further learning.
  • Consistent referral to grades and the levels that students are working towards allows students to see what is expected of them and what success looks like.
  • Extension questions are used to encourage in-depth thinking and thinking beyond.
  • ‘Even better if’ comments promote deeper thinking and understanding for the students and are responded to thoughtfully.

 Where learning is less effective:

  • Students are not engaged in their learning and consequently they are off task.
  • Questioning is closed and does not develop clear understanding for all.
  • Opportunities are not taken to deal with misunderstandings and misconceptions to deepen knowledge or challenge the more able.
  • Inconsistent use is made of ‘even better if’ comments.
  • The pace of the lesson is too slow resulting in students making too little progress.
  • Teachers talk during ‘thinking’ and ‘working’ times which distracts students from their work.

Actions

  • Teachers and leaders should demonstrate the high expectations expected by the school for the quality of learning so that it is evident in classrooms and students’ work.
  • Teachers and leaders should ensure consistency in presentation, marking and feedback so that students can make good progress.
  • Consistency of in class support and marking is required to ensure that the good progress of children in care is maintained.
  • Improve the quality of teaching and learning by: ensuring that assessment is used effectively to inform teachers’ planning and delivery of future learning; ensuring lessons are planned around clear learning objectives which are based on what students already know, understand and can do; ensuring that the pitch, differentiation and pace of lessons allows students to make good progress; developing the use of questioning so that students can consolidate their learning and are challenged to articulate their thinking and understanding
  • Review the use and effectiveness of 100 minute lessons
  • The Local Authority to explore the commissioned support for the school with regard to Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND).

School Effectiveness Cornwall – Pupil Premium monitoring visit Monday 25th September 2017

Summary

  • There has been a positive and purposeful start to the term and this is evidenced in the books of pupil premium students and conversation with them.
  • The governors have been involved in the current review of progress for students eligible for pupil premium. They are regularly conducting work scrutiny of a sample of students’ work which includes those that are disadvantaged. They scrutinise the pupil premium spend and there is a nominated governor with pupil premium oversight.
  • Students and staff share a sense that expectations and aspirations have been raised for all students. It is important that, in the effort to raise the progress and achievement of disadvantaged pupils, appropriate language is used. The 2017-18 plan suggests that these students need to ‘catch-up’, but the school knows that it has more able pupil premium students who are achieving well.
  • Leadership of pupil premium is clear and staff know that this is a priority for the school.
  • The evidence of focused interventions for pupil premium students in Key Stage 3 suggest that, in the long term, progress will increase.

Actions

  • Use the best practice seen in some lessons to drive improvements in the teaching of disadvantaged students.
  • Further work needs to be done to develop consistency in marking and feedback across subjects.
  • Teaching and learning should make best use of questioning to extend students’ understanding (metacognition) and to target questioning in order to improve the progress of disadvantaged pupils.
  • Teachers need to develop an understanding of the sub-sets of student groupings. E.g. More able pupil premium students.
  • The school website needs to be updated.

 

 

Leave a Reply